What is the main advantage of adopting a start-small transition model instead of an all-in model?

The primary advantage of adopting a start-small transition model is that it effectively limits risks by confining experiments to a few projects. This approach allows an organization to test out new processes, techniques, or changes on a smaller scale before committing to a full implementation across the entire organization. By starting with a limited scope, teams can identify potential issues, gather feedback, and adjust their strategies based on real-world results without jeopardizing the entire operation.

This method enables incremental improvements, as lessons learned from the initial projects can be applied to subsequent phases of the transition. If something does not work as planned, the impact is minimized, and adjustments can be made before expanding the approach to more significant areas of the organization. It creates a safer environment for experimentation and fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptation, which is at the heart of agile methodologies.

In contrast, immediate full-scale implementation could lead to widespread challenges and resistance if issues arise, while ensuring that all team members are on board often requires more time and consensus-building, and less training may not effectively prepare teams for the changes involved in agile practices.